<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:05:36 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>MedTech</title><description></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech</link><managingEditor>Benjamin Stein</managingEditor><openSearch:itemsPerPage>15</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/115393534565793210</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-07-26T13:40:21.575-04:00</atom:updated><title>Stein the Ghost</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This doesn't have much to do with medical technology, but there's a cool new blog up called &lt;a href="http://steintheghost.wordpress.com">Stein the Ghost&lt;/a>.&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2006/07/stein-ghost.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/113072453269200311</guid><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-30T21:08:52.706-05:00</atom:updated><title>Will Medical Technology Lead to Cost Savings?</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=16&amp;artnum=1&amp;amp;issue=20051028">Investor's Business Daily&lt;/a> had an interesting (if not very well written) piece on health care technology and the potential cost savings that it creates.  Nothing too profound here, but nice to see this sort of coverage in a financial publication.&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/will-medical-technology-lead-to-cost.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/113045234086432111</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-27T18:32:20.883-04:00</atom:updated><title>Radiology Communication &amp; Documentation</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;span class="h1format">&lt;a href="http://www.vocada.com/">Vocada&lt;/a> &amp; &lt;a href="http://www.commissure.com">Commissure&lt;/a>, two radiology technology firms have &lt;a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/10/prweb302509.htm">linked up&lt;/a> to create "&lt;/span>&lt;span class="h1format">the first integrated solution for medical communications and documentation."&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />Vocada sells voice software that enables diagnostic radiologists to streamline their communication with the rest of an organization.  Commissue provides a documentation and communication platform that is based on patented voice recognition software.&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">By integrating these two solutions, radiology departments for the first time will be able to fully automate the entire clinical workflow for ordering, documenting, communicating and reporting radiological examinations, thereby setting new benchmarks for physician productivity and patient safety.  &lt;span style="font-style: italic;">&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;/span>&lt;/span>The product is set to be unveiled at this year's &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=U&amp;start=1&amp;amp;si=1&amp;oi=smap&amp;amp;q=http://rsna2005.rsna.org/rsna2005/V2005/index.cvn">RSNA conference&lt;/a> Nov 27th-Dec 3 in Chicago.&lt;br />&lt;br />I have to say, I'm always pretty skeptical about voice recognition software of any kind.   My phone can't tell the difference between "Mom" and "Grandmother".  Not sure I trust my diagnosis to voice recognition: hernia, herpes, and hemerroids all sounds way too similar if you ask me!&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">&lt;/span>&lt;/span>&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/radiology-communication-documentation.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/113044853405145368</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-27T17:28:54.073-04:00</atom:updated><title>Microsoft Office and Healthcare</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rruggeri/default.aspx">Healthcare IT Blog&lt;/a> over at Microsoft is &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rruggeri/archive/2005/10/27/485708.aspx">reporting &lt;/a>about a number of new Reference Implementations for MS Office specific for health care.  These are collections of templates and sample code that integrate all parts of MS Office to solve business problems. For example, you can use Word, Infopath, BizTalk, and Sharepoint to manage your &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itsolutions/cits/iwp/ricm/tninput.mspx">clinical forms&lt;/a>.&lt;br />Solutions are also available for download for Care Management, Clinical Trials, and Clinical Systems.  See the original source for more links.&lt;br />&lt;br />It's nice to see Microsoft moving Office to a serious platform as opposed to just a bunch of standalone apps.  I definitely like the direction they're going with it.  They really are playing in a different space than just Word processing and document management.  Now I understand why they aren't too concerned about OpenOffice 2.0.&lt;br />&lt;br />My only hope is that they really do adopt the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument">Open Document Format&lt;/a> in Office 12.  Having my health care records in a proprietary format doesn't jive well with me.&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/microsoft-office-and-healthcare.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/113043667515993454</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-27T14:11:15.183-04:00</atom:updated><title>iCAD, one of the leading CAD applications for mamm...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://www.icadmed.com">iCAD&lt;/a>, one of the leading CAD applications for mammography &lt;a href="http://www.icadmed.com/html/content_view.asp?type=1&amp;id=164">announced&lt;/a> it's new PureLook Mammography Film Digitizer. This product fills an interesting and necessary gap. One important measurement for diagnosis in radiological images is change over time. Many patients have had film screenings in the past while recent scans have all been digital. The PureLook digitizer scans the film into high resolution digital images to provide the same analysis that the digital images currently receive.&lt;br />&lt;br />The press release explains it a little more eloquently that I did:&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">Mammography relies heavily upon a comparative look at prior years of mammograms to check for change over time. According to the American Cancer Society over 90% of the estimated 48 million mammograms taken this year are for women who have previous studies. Digital Mammography can represent a break in the context between the prior year mammograms and the current digital mammogram. This is a major concern since mammography is interpreted with as much emphasis on information from the prior years as the current year. PureLook was specifically developed to capture the full fidelity of film based mammograms to avoid any break in context and provide the gateway for clinics to transition to digital.&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />I guess the significant part of their product is that the scanner doesn't use mirrors or traditional lenses that typically distort the image in some way.  Pretty cool niche product here.&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/icad-one-of-leading-cad-applications.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/113034962458097878</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-27T01:06:41.696-04:00</atom:updated><title>"Researchers"</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">There has been much contraversy t0 date about whether or not cell phones cause interference in the presence of medical devices.  Some people think they are a big problem, while others think they're crazy.  I've always thought of it like a cell phone on an airplane - I'm almost positive it won't make a difference, but is it really worth trying??&lt;br />&lt;br />Anyway, according to &lt;a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=healthNews&amp;storyid=2005-10-25T193212Z_01_RID570244_RTRUKOC_0_US-CELL-MEDICAL.xml">this Reuters article&lt;/a>, cell phones cause &lt;span style="font-style: italic;">some &lt;/span>interference to medical devices. How's that for commitment?&lt;br />&lt;br />Their conclusion:&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">"Technological changes to either cellular telephones or to medical devices may continue to mitigate or may possibly worsen electromagnetic interference," &lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />What kind of science is this? My cat could have told you that, and I don't even have a cat! All I know, is that when I go under the knife next month, my surgeon better be using a hands-free device!&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/researchers.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/113034905519895948</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-26T13:50:55.200-04:00</atom:updated><title>BioScanIR Presented to Investors Today</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Yahoo Finance is &lt;a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/051025/255979.html?.v=1">reporting&lt;/a> that &lt;a href="http://www.trilogy-capital.com/abph_summary.aspx">Advanced BioPhotonics&lt;/a>, a Long Island, NY based developer of next-generation medical imaging applications will present its first market-ready product, the BioScanIR at the PIPEs Inverstor Conference in NYC today.  From the article:&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">The BioScanIR® System measures abnormal blood flow by detecting minute changes in the pattern of infrared photon emissions over time, called photon flux. The detection and analysis of these changes to blood flow enables physicians and medical researchers to differentiate between normal and abnormal tissues and to determine disease conditions. The system is designed to assist physicians in assessing underlying pathologies in a completely non-invasive, non-toxic, relatively low-cost and very rapid method.&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />Alright guys - I think if you're a publically traded company presenting financial information to investors, it's time to get your own domain name.  This http://www.trilogy-capital.com/abph_summary.aspx business is just embarrassing.&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/bioscanir-presented-to-investors-today.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/113034860126987944</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-26T13:43:21.273-04:00</atom:updated><title>"Pill Camera" Progress</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Yahoo Finance is &lt;a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/051026/265418.html?.v=1">reporting &lt;/a>that &lt;a href="http://medisciencetech.com">Mediscience &lt;/a>and &lt;a href="http://www.infotonics.org/">Infotonics &lt;/a>'proof-of-concept &lt;a href="http://www.infotonics.org/ResearchProjects/CompactPhotonicExplorers.asp">"Compact Photonic Explorer"&lt;/a> (AKA "Pill Camera") was successful.  No clue when this sort of thing will pass clinical trials and be available, but good to know we're getting closer to &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;ct=res&amp;amp;cd=1&amp;url=http%3A//www.imdb.com/title/tt0093260/&amp;amp;ei=F8BfQ7avKpv4-AGr1_yVBA&amp;amp;sig2=10Zw1qdr4jydWGwe5MIScQ">Inner Space&lt;/a>.&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/pill-camera-progress.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/113026911120732372</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-25T15:38:31.206-04:00</atom:updated><title>LightSpeed VCT Recognized by WSJ</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The Wall Street Journal (no link - reg required) awared GE's &lt;a href="http://www.gehealthcare.com/usen/ct/products/vct.html">LightSpeed VCT&lt;/a> a "Technology Innovation Award".  This bad boy can image the heart in 3D in under 5 seconds.  Seriously impressive.&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">The LightSpeed VCT also has the capability to attain 43-millisecond temporal resolution, which means physicians can effectively freeze the motion of the heart in a scan and secure extremely high-quality images of coronary arteries at submillimeter. As a result, GE's LightSpeed VCT enables physicians to capture images of the heart and coronary arteries in just five heartbeats - something no other CT system can offer.&lt;/span>&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/lightspeed-vct-recognized-by-wsj.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/113026880851977074</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-25T15:33:28.523-04:00</atom:updated><title>ChartLogic Appoints new Med Director</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Yahoo News is &lt;a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/051024/lam084.html?.v=23">reporting &lt;/a>that &lt;a href="http://www.chartlogic.com/">ChartLogic&lt;/a>, the Utah based medical technology company, has appointed a new medical director.  Dr. James Strickland will lead advisory panels to provide more user input into the company's products.  Good luck to Dr. Strickland in his new post.&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/chartlogic-appoints-new-med-director.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/113026258426561458</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-25T13:49:44.266-04:00</atom:updated><title>EMR Experts and Acrendo Team Up</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://www.acrendo.com/">Acrendo&lt;/a>, makers of the AImed EMR software have teamed up with &lt;a href="http://www.emrexperts.com">emrexperts &lt;/a>to broaden their product base.  The emrexperts site has been updated to include &lt;a href="http://www.emrexperts.com/products.php">links to AImed&lt;/a>.  I haven't grokked this announcement completely yet - I'm not sure how much overlap there is in these two products that both claim to be EMR solutions.  I'll post more on this after I do some research.&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/emr-experts-and-acrendo-team-up.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/113026226381674082</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-25T13:44:23.816-04:00</atom:updated><title>ClearHealth v1 RC2 available</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://www.op-en.org">Op/En&lt;/a> has released RC2 of &lt;a href="http://www.op-en.org/site/ClearHealth/details.html">ClearHealth&lt;/a>, their open source medical practice management system.  From their site:&lt;br /> &lt;span style="font-style: italic;">ClearHealth is the First Free and Open Source Practice Management System to address the big five features: Medical Billing, Medical Accounts Recievable, Scheduling, Access Control, and EMR.&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />I don't know how many institutions are currently using or planning to use ClearHealth.  Personally, I would prefer to know that my medical records were using version 1 final, or preferably version 2.&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/clearhealth-v1-rc2-available.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/113026200937889900</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-25T13:40:09.383-04:00</atom:updated><title>First all-Java EHR system deployed</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://www.dinmar.com">DINMAR &lt;/a>, a Candian medical technology company, has released the first 100% Java EHR (electronic health record) system at  &lt;a href="http://www.ottawahospital.on.ca/" target="_blank" class="blines3" title="Link outside of this blog">The Ottawa Hospital&lt;/a>.&lt;br />The software is called &lt;a href="http://www.dinmar.com/00oacis.php">OOacis&lt;/a>.  Press release &lt;a href="http://www.dinmar.com/docs/TOH-OacisEHRlive-e.pdf">available in pdf&lt;/a>.&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.ottawahospital.on.ca/" target="_blank" class="blines3" title="Link outside of this blog"> &lt;/a>&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/first-all-java-ehr-system-deployed.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/112990233872122064</guid><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-21T09:45:38.730-04:00</atom:updated><title>Siemens Introduces MammoSmart</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Siemens Medical has a new hardware/software solution called &lt;a href="http://www.medical.siemens.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10001&amp;catalogId=-1&amp;langId=-1&amp;level=1&amp;catTree=100001,12787,12817*395206718*1956856228&amp;categoryId=1004603&amp;productId=146643">MammoSmart&lt;/a> that provides patients with DVDs of their mammography history, including images, demographic info, and medical history.&lt;br />&lt;/p>&lt;br />&lt;p>&lt;br />&lt;img src="http://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/en_US/rg_oem_FBAs/images/product_images/MammaUSA/MammoSmartRobot.jpg">&lt;br />&lt;/p>&lt;br />&lt;p>&lt;br />It connects to a variety of PACS devices and reporting systems and does the disc burning right there.  I wonder if radiology centers are going to pass this cost on to patients?  I recently had an MRI and they wanted $35 for a CD with my images. How obnoxious is that??&lt;br />&lt;/p>&lt;br />&lt;p>&lt;br />If you ask me, this product looks like a glorified &lt;a href="http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=9/502&amp;pq-locale=en_US">Kodak Photo Kiosk&lt;/a>!&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/siemens-introduces-mammosmart.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18104851/posts/full/112985870020631243</guid><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-10-20T21:41:17.813-04:00</atom:updated><title>Home Patient Monitoring</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;p class="mobile-post">This is also old, but part of what inspired me to start this blog in&lt;br />the first place.  Business2.0 magazine had a cover story a while back&lt;br />asking 10 VCs what they would fund &lt;b>right now&lt;/b> and what they&lt;br />would pay. Pretty fun read.&lt;/p>&lt;p class="mobile-post">The most interesting one was for a &lt;a href="http://www.business2.com/b2/web/articles/0,17863,1096807-11,00.html">Home&lt;br />Patient Monitoring&lt;/a> system.&lt;/p>&lt;p class="mobile-post">David Aslin and Paul Badawi pledged $8million for a prototype and solid team.&lt;/p>&lt;p class="mobile-post">From the aricle:&lt;br />&lt;i>No one likes extended hospital stays. Not patients, not hospitals,&lt;br />and not insurance companies paying bills that can exceed $5,000 a day.&lt;br />For the critically ill, there's no way around lengthy visits. But&lt;br />thousands of other patients could be sent home early if they could be&lt;br />monitored at home or at a lower-cost facility. Badawi and Aslin&lt;br />envision a wireless transmitter that would attach to existing hardware&lt;br />such as portable ECG machines and heart-rate and blood-pressure&lt;br />monitors. The device would send data through a wireless router to a&lt;br />cluster of back-office servers. The servers would function like a call&lt;br />center, routing a patient's vital signs to the right nursing station&lt;br />or on-call physician. Trimming just two days off the typical 10-day&lt;br />hospital stay for stroke victims would be a service worth $2.7&lt;br />billion.&lt;/i>&lt;/p>&lt;p class="mobile-post">As Badawi accurately explains:&lt;br />&lt;i>"It's not the technology, it's the complexity of navigating the&lt;br />health-care system that's going to be difficult,"&lt;/i>&lt;/p>&lt;p class="mobile-post">Anyone want to help me out?&lt;/p>&lt;/div></description><link>http://alltooflat.com/geeky/medtech/2005/10/home-patient-monitoring.html</link><author>Benjamin Stein</author></item></channel></rss>